01 — What you get
I turn twenty priorities into five
Twenty competing priorities become five with owners and dates. I write the operating rhythm and then I run it, so decisions stop dying in Slack.
Tap to open
Based between Belgium and France · Open to relocation
I'm Simran. I walk into messy, fast-moving companies — usually startups — and give them structure: priorities people can name, numbers people trust, and a plan that actually ships.

Strategy · Finance · Operations














01 — About me
01 — What you get
Twenty competing priorities become five with owners and dates. I write the operating rhythm and then I run it, so decisions stop dying in Slack.
Tap to open
02 — What you get
Budgets, forecasts, unit economics, KPI packs. Not decoration — a model your leadership team and your investors can both argue with.
Tap to open
03 — What you get
Strategy documents are easy. I stay for the unglamorous half: process, controls, follow-up, and the person who has to actually do the work.
Tap to open
04 — What you get
I build small agents and workflows that take the repetitive work off my desk, so my week goes into judgement instead of copy-paste.
Tap to open
Here is the honest version: most of the companies I have worked with were not short on ideas. They were short on structure. Twenty priorities, no owner, a forecast nobody believed, and a leadership team spending its week firefighting. That is the room I walk into, and that is the room I like.
As Chief of Staff at Wonka AI in Brussels I sat next to the CEO and turned all of that into something you can run a company on — OKRs, an operating rhythm, a budget and forecast that hold up, a ~€3M subsidy file, investor conversations, hiring, and the boring plumbing that quietly makes a startup faster.
Before that I worked with founders and senior leadership at VLGE in Paris across finance, strategy and business development. And before the startup years, financial services — Willis Towers Watson and Cognizant — taught me the discipline: reconcile it, control it, evidence it, then say it out loud in one page.
Chief of Staff is one label for what I do, not the whole of it. Strategy, FP&A and finance, business operations, transformation and PMO, risk and process excellence — same job underneath. Frame the problem, do the actual analysis, and stay until it lands.
I'm PMP® certified and a Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt. I enjoy working where strategy meets execution: bringing structure to complex problems, aligning stakeholders and turning decisions into action.
Subsidy application structured and coordinated
Reduction in processing cycle time (Lean Six Sigma)
Less reconciliation time across reporting workflows
Years across strategy, finance and operations
Ecosystem initiatives I've driven
OpenAI Select
NVIDIA Inception
Claude Partner Network
Deloitte Rising Star02 — How I actually work
This is my operating model — whether the title on the door says Chief of Staff, strategy, business operations, FP&A or transformation. Chaos goes in on the left. Something a leadership team can run on comes out on the right.
Pillar C
How people work together determines how fast a company can move.
Tap to open
Pillar O
Ideas need rhythm, ownership and follow-through.
Tap to open
Pillar S
Every small decision should connect to a bigger direction.
Tap to open
CEO priorities
What leadership needs to be true in 6, 12, 24 months.
Company realities
Capacity, cash, systems and what the team can actually absorb.
People & blockers
The follow-ups and frictions that quietly decide whether strategy moves.

From my LinkedIn
Yesterday, over tea, a neighbour asked me: “So, what do you actually do as a Chief of Staff?”
Before I could respond, he added with a smile: “Doesn’t sound like that big of a deal.” I smiled too — not because he was wrong, but because I knew the answer wouldn’t fit into one casual conversation over tea.
Being a Chief of Staff is like standing at a very unusual intersection. One road leads to the CEO’s priorities. Another leads to the company’s realities. And another leads to people, culture, decisions, blockers, meetings, follow-ups — the million tiny things that determine whether strategy actually moves.
Some days you’re close to the CEO’s calendar. Some days you’re close to the team’s confusion. Some days you’re quietly making sure a blocker never becomes a business problem.
A Chief of Staff is not just “leadership”. And it’s definitely not just “staff”. It’s the role that moves between both.
By the end of the conversation my neighbour said: “Okay… now that sounds difficult.” And honestly, I laughed. Because yes — it is. But that’s also what makes it meaningful. Impact often comes from the work no one notices.
03 — Experience
I partnered with the CEO on company-wide priorities spanning strategy, finance, operations, legal, HR and organizational execution.
04 — Featured work
Tap any card to open the full story: the mess I walked into, the framework I used, and the numbers that moved.
04 — Frameworks
I don't collect frameworks — I use a small number of them properly. Hover or tap a card to open the shape of the method and where I've actually applied it.
Quality · Risk · Compliance
Corrective & Preventive Action
Tap to open
Process excellence
Lean Six Sigma improvement cycle
Tap to open
Strategy execution
Objectives & Key Results
Tap to open
Ownership clarity
Responsible · Accountable · Consulted · Informed
Tap to open
Programme management
Risks · Assumptions · Issues · Dependencies
Tap to open
Finance & risk
Likelihood × impact assessment
Tap to open
Planning
Prioritisation
Tap to open
Strategy
Market & competitive analysis
Tap to open
06 — AI in my workflow
How the agents connect
inputs → agents → governance → outputs
Nothing reaches a board pack or a supplier without passing me first — that dashed lane is the point of the whole system.
In my current role I stopped waiting for tools to exist and built them. An agent that hunts down missing invoices before close. Automations that take the manual steps out of approvals and reporting. A governance layer so none of it runs unwatched. AI gave me back the hours — I keep the judgement, the relationships and the final word.
Reconciles what was ordered, delivered and billed, then chases the gaps. It finds the invoices nobody noticed were missing before month-end close does.
Close prep from days to hours
I map the process by hand first, cut the steps that exist only out of habit, then automate what's left — approvals, handovers, status updates, recurring reports.
Manual steps removed, not hidden
Every agent has an owner, a documented prompt, a data boundary and a review point. Governance is what makes automation safe enough to keep.
Documented, auditable, rerunnable
Investor lists, market maps and competitor briefs — sourced, deduplicated and returned as a structured table I can act on the same morning.
~70% of prep time back
First drafts of investor updates, executive memos and subsidy narratives, working from my own tone-of-voice and past documents.
Version one in minutes
Turns transcripts into decisions, owners and dated actions that land straight in the tracker — no post-meeting archaeology.
Zero lost actions
Pulls KPI data, flags variances against budget and writes the commentary I then challenge and correct.
Variance flagged before the meeting
The loop I actually run
Step 1 / 6
I collect the raw material — Slack threads, board asks, half-finished decks, transcripts, the spreadsheet nobody trusts. No filtering yet. An agent strips it into one clean brief so I'm reading signal, not scrolling.
The agent does
Intake agent: transcripts, docs and threads in, one structured brief out.
I do
I decide what's actually in scope and what's noise pretending to be urgent.
Time reclaimed, by task
Indicative share of manual effort removed on recurring tasks — the saved hours go back into strategy and people work.
My guardrails

06 — Master thesis & defense
Perceptions, Challenges and Opportunities Among International Financial Institutions
Aix-Marseille Graduate School of Management — IAE · MSc International Finance · 2024 — 2025 · Under the guidance of Dr. Robert J. Martinez, PhD
The question
Financial institutions are under growing pressure to integrate ESG factors, and AI offers scalable tools for ESG data processing, risk modelling and reporting. My research asked practitioners what is actually happening: how AI is used in sustainable finance today, what limits adoption, whether global scaling is feasible — especially in emerging markets — and whether current ethical and regulatory frameworks are sufficient.
How I researched it — Qualitative + quantitative mix
Anonymised senior practitioners across EU and global financial and infrastructure institutions — use cases, benefits, barriers, scalability and outlook.
Banking, asset management and fintech; closed-ended plus open text on adoption, challenges and feasibility.
Thematic coding of interviews, keyword and frequency analysis of survey responses.
What I found
AI is being piloted — not yet embedded — to support ESG goals, risk visibility and reporting across ESG scoring, document intelligence, climate risk and responsible lending.
Data quality is the number one barrier, cited by 8 of 11 practitioners; non-standard ESG data means better models cannot fix inconsistent inputs.
Human-in-the-loop remains essential, and adoption succeeds where it is co-designed with the workforce, unions and regulators — trust is part of deployment.
Global scaling is feasible but conditional on data infrastructure, local adaptation and workforce training, particularly in emerging markets.
Explainability is a commercial requirement, not an ethical extra — unexplainable ESG decisions do not survive investor or regulator scrutiny.
DistinctionRecognised as best student in Corporate Finance by the Head of the Master of International Finance.
Barriers to adoption — practitioner survey
8 of 11 respondents — the binding constraint.
ESG data and scoring diverge across providers.
Model opacity blocks regulated decisions.
Workforce readiness lags the tooling.
Acute in emerging-market institutions.
Research pillars

Recommendations — for institutions
Recommendations — for regulators
“AI in finance isn't a replacement — it's a recalibration of how we see value, risk and responsibility.”
07 — How I work
I bring structure to complex problems: priorities, OKRs, operating rhythms, decision logs and follow-through that actually lands.
Languages I speak
08 — Education & credentials

Aix-Marseille Graduate School of Management — IAE · 2024 — 2025
Research on AI in Sustainable Finance: ESG analytics, climate risk, data governance and responsible AI. Recognized as best student in Corporate Finance by the Head of the Master of International Finance.

Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management · 2025
Exchange program in Brussels.

Somaiya Vidyavihar University · 2016 — 2021
Foundation in accounting, finance and commerce.
Certifications — what each one actually gave me

Project Management Institute
The global standard for managing scope, schedule, cost, risk and stakeholders across predictive and agile delivery.
Process excellence
DMAIC, root-cause analysis and process mapping — the toolkit behind my 25% cycle-time reduction.
Professional programme
Operating models for the CoS role: executive partnership, cadence design and decision support.
Finance
Budgeting, forecasting, working capital and performance analysis for leadership decision-making.
Risk
Credit assessment, exposure and default risk fundamentals applied to lending and counterparty decisions.
Data
Querying and joining operational data directly, so reporting doesn't wait on someone else's queue.
Financial services
FHA, VA, USDA and Jumbo products, documentation review and regulatory compliance.
09 — Moments
10 — Contact
I'm based between Belgium and France, and I'm open to relocating for the right team. Strategy and business operations, finance and FP&A, transformation and PMO, risk and process excellence — and yes, Chief of Staff too. If the job is to bring order to something growing faster than its structure, we should talk. Either inbox reaches me; email is fastest.